<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236486</link>
    <description>Where an importer obtained a No Objection Certificate from the competent drug authority under the applicable customs and drug-control instructions, import of drugs could not be treated as illegal merely because the consignment was routed through a non-specified port. The goods were accompanied by the NOC, the sample matched the declaration, and the NOC was issued for release of the goods. On that basis, confiscation of the goods and the penalty were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236486</link>
      <description>Where an importer obtained a No Objection Certificate from the competent drug authority under the applicable customs and drug-control instructions, import of drugs could not be treated as illegal merely because the consignment was routed through a non-specified port. The goods were accompanied by the NOC, the sample matched the declaration, and the NOC was issued for release of the goods. On that basis, confiscation of the goods and the penalty were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>