<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 777 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236485</link>
    <description>Inspection charges incurred to obtain a pre-import certificate were held includible in the customs assessable value because the purchase arrangement made that certificate a contractual obligation of the seller, and the buyer incurred the cost to satisfy that obligation before import. By contrast, erection, installation and commissioning charges, together with allied post-importation services, were excluded because the cranes were sold in disassembled form, title and risk passed on shipment, and the service arrangement was separate; those costs were not a condition of sale or part of the price of the imported goods. The valuation principle applied is that only amounts incurred as a contractual condition of sale are includible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 777 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236485</link>
      <description>Inspection charges incurred to obtain a pre-import certificate were held includible in the customs assessable value because the purchase arrangement made that certificate a contractual obligation of the seller, and the buyer incurred the cost to satisfy that obligation before import. By contrast, erection, installation and commissioning charges, together with allied post-importation services, were excluded because the cranes were sold in disassembled form, title and risk passed on shipment, and the service arrangement was separate; those costs were not a condition of sale or part of the price of the imported goods. The valuation principle applied is that only amounts incurred as a contractual condition of sale are includible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>