<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 772 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236480</link>
    <description>Deemed MODVAT credit under Rule 57A(6) could not be denied where inputs were received directly under invoices declaring duty payment and correctly stating invoice price, because the notification&#039;s conditions were satisfied. The supplier&#039;s alleged short-payment of duty was a lapse at the seller&#039;s end and was not itself a ground to refuse credit under the prescribed scheme. The buyer&#039;s obligation was only to take all reasonable steps on the basis of the accompanying documents; it was not required to conduct independent departmental verification of actual duty payment by the supplier. On those terms, compliance with the notification entitled the assessee to credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 772 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236480</link>
      <description>Deemed MODVAT credit under Rule 57A(6) could not be denied where inputs were received directly under invoices declaring duty payment and correctly stating invoice price, because the notification&#039;s conditions were satisfied. The supplier&#039;s alleged short-payment of duty was a lapse at the seller&#039;s end and was not itself a ground to refuse credit under the prescribed scheme. The buyer&#039;s obligation was only to take all reasonable steps on the basis of the accompanying documents; it was not required to conduct independent departmental verification of actual duty payment by the supplier. On those terms, compliance with the notification entitled the assessee to credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>