<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 770 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Orders-in-Original confirming duty under Rule 10A of the Valuation Rules, with interest, but set aside imposed penalties. Sales tax paid by the appellants was to be deducted from the value. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 770 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Orders-in-Original confirming duty under Rule 10A of the Valuation Rules, with interest, but set aside imposed penalties. Sales tax paid by the appellants was to be deducted from the value. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>