<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 746 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236454</link>
    <description>Services of erection, commissioning and installation used for electricity distribution were treated as covered by the exemption and immunity notifications applicable to transmission and distribution of electricity. The phrase &quot;in relation to&quot; was read broadly to include activities with a direct and proximate nexus to distribution, including installation of sub-stations, transmission towers, meters and related infrastructure necessary for billing and recovery. Read together, the notifications were taken to reflect a policy of excluding such connected services from service tax, and the disputed services were therefore regarded as not taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 746 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236454</link>
      <description>Services of erection, commissioning and installation used for electricity distribution were treated as covered by the exemption and immunity notifications applicable to transmission and distribution of electricity. The phrase &quot;in relation to&quot; was read broadly to include activities with a direct and proximate nexus to distribution, including installation of sub-stations, transmission towers, meters and related infrastructure necessary for billing and recovery. Read together, the notifications were taken to reflect a policy of excluding such connected services from service tax, and the disputed services were therefore regarded as not taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>