<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 741 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and canceled the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that there was no concrete evidence of inaccurate particulars or concealed income, and the additions were based on estimates without sufficient proof of wrongdoing. Therefore, the penalty was deemed unwarranted, and the Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders, ultimately canceling the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 741 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and canceled the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that there was no concrete evidence of inaccurate particulars or concealed income, and the additions were based on estimates without sufficient proof of wrongdoing. Therefore, the penalty was deemed unwarranted, and the Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders, ultimately canceling the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>