<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 739 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the treatment of short term capital gain as capital gains, modifying the treatment of long term capital gain, and deleting the addition of estimated commission. The Tribunal rejected the addition of commission paid for arranging long term capital gain and directed the Assessing Officer to treat the long term capital gain as short term capital gain.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 739 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the treatment of short term capital gain as capital gains, modifying the treatment of long term capital gain, and deleting the addition of estimated commission. The Tribunal rejected the addition of commission paid for arranging long term capital gain and directed the Assessing Officer to treat the long term capital gain as short term capital gain.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>