https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236433 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of drawback claims due to fraudulent exports, set aside redemption fines, and reduced penalties imposed on the appellants. The denial of DEPB scrips was considered procedurally improper but moot due to expiration. Procedural objections raised by the appellants were dismissed, emphasizing the connection between seizure and investigation. The decision aimed to penalize fraud while ensuring procedural fairness and proportionality in penalties. en-us Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 05:52:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236433 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of drawback claims due to fraudulent exports, set aside redemption fines, and reduced penalties imposed on the appellants. The denial of DEPB scrips was considered procedurally improper but moot due to expiration. Procedural objections raised by the appellants were dismissed, emphasizing the connection between seizure and investigation. The decision aimed to penalize fraud while ensuring procedural fairness and proportionality in penalties. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236433