<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 717 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236425</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of Customs and Central Excise duty demands and penalties against M/s Laurel Apparels Pvt. Ltd. for non-utilization and diversion of imported inputs. It found that the adjudicating authority did not err in disregarding the Tribunal&#039;s directions, emphasized the reliance on statements without cross-examination, did not specifically address the validity of the second Show Cause Notice, and required an additional pre-deposit of Rs.35 lakhs despite the appellant&#039;s financial hardship. The Tribunal stressed procedural compliance, detailed investigations, and a balanced approach to pre-deposit requirements in its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 717 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236425</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of Customs and Central Excise duty demands and penalties against M/s Laurel Apparels Pvt. Ltd. for non-utilization and diversion of imported inputs. It found that the adjudicating authority did not err in disregarding the Tribunal&#039;s directions, emphasized the reliance on statements without cross-examination, did not specifically address the validity of the second Show Cause Notice, and required an additional pre-deposit of Rs.35 lakhs despite the appellant&#039;s financial hardship. The Tribunal stressed procedural compliance, detailed investigations, and a balanced approach to pre-deposit requirements in its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>