<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 714 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236422</link>
    <description>A 722-day delay in filing tax appeals was condoned where the State explained that the lapse arose from administrative processing, file movement, internal approval, and time spent in the Government Pleader&#039;s office. The Court applied a justice-oriented approach, noting that condonation should not turn on technicalities when there is no deliberate inaction or lack of bona fides. It treated the substantial tax stake, public interest, and the preference for merits-based adjudication as relevant factors, and accepted that governmental decision-making may be slowed by procedural red tape within reasonable limits. Costs were imposed on the State.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 714 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236422</link>
      <description>A 722-day delay in filing tax appeals was condoned where the State explained that the lapse arose from administrative processing, file movement, internal approval, and time spent in the Government Pleader&#039;s office. The Court applied a justice-oriented approach, noting that condonation should not turn on technicalities when there is no deliberate inaction or lack of bona fides. It treated the substantial tax stake, public interest, and the preference for merits-based adjudication as relevant factors, and accepted that governmental decision-making may be slowed by procedural red tape within reasonable limits. Costs were imposed on the State.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>