<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 701 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of interest expenses disallowance, agreeing with the CIT(A) that the expenses were incurred out of commercial expediency. However, the Tribunal set aside the transfer pricing adjustment and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price using the appropriate method. The department&#039;s appeal was allowed in part for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 701 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of interest expenses disallowance, agreeing with the CIT(A) that the expenses were incurred out of commercial expediency. However, the Tribunal set aside the transfer pricing adjustment and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price using the appropriate method. The department&#039;s appeal was allowed in part for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>