https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236406 The appeal of the assessee was dismissed as the CIT(A) and the Tribunal upheld the additions made by the AO due to non-compliance and failure to produce necessary evidence. The non-admission of additional evidence was justified under Rule 46A, and the estimation of income based on the GP rate from the preceding year was deemed appropriate. The Tribunal found no merit in the grounds raised by the assessee and confirmed the order of the CIT(A). en-us Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236406 The appeal of the assessee was dismissed as the CIT(A) and the Tribunal upheld the additions made by the AO due to non-compliance and failure to produce necessary evidence. The non-admission of additional evidence was justified under Rule 46A, and the estimation of income based on the GP rate from the preceding year was deemed appropriate. The Tribunal found no merit in the grounds raised by the assessee and confirmed the order of the CIT(A). Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236406