<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 683 - CESTAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit for the appellant concerning exempted goods &quot;Bagasse,&quot; disagreeing with the adjudicating authority&#039;s interpretation of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules. The Tribunal referenced precedents to support its decision, emphasizing the need for consistent application of rules and precedents in tax cases. The ruling highlights the importance of fair and consistent interpretation and application of legal provisions in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 07:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 683 - CESTAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit for the appellant concerning exempted goods &quot;Bagasse,&quot; disagreeing with the adjudicating authority&#039;s interpretation of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules. The Tribunal referenced precedents to support its decision, emphasizing the need for consistent application of rules and precedents in tax cases. The ruling highlights the importance of fair and consistent interpretation and application of legal provisions in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>