<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 682 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the limitation period for issuing the Show Cause Notice and the jurisdiction of the adjudicating authority. However, the Tribunal found against the appellant on the under-valuation of goods cleared issue, directing the valuation of clearances to their own units based on the value adopted for independent buyers. The Tribunal also instructed the adjudicating authority to re-quantify the demand, exclude certain clearances, and reconsider penalties, remanding the matter for further assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 682 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the limitation period for issuing the Show Cause Notice and the jurisdiction of the adjudicating authority. However, the Tribunal found against the appellant on the under-valuation of goods cleared issue, directing the valuation of clearances to their own units based on the value adopted for independent buyers. The Tribunal also instructed the adjudicating authority to re-quantify the demand, exclude certain clearances, and reconsider penalties, remanding the matter for further assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>