<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 667 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236375</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopened assessment and permitting the claims for additional depreciation and deduction under section 80HHC. The order emphasized adherence to judicial precedents and statutory interpretations, ensuring the assessee&#039;s claims were in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 667 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236375</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopened assessment and permitting the claims for additional depreciation and deduction under section 80HHC. The order emphasized adherence to judicial precedents and statutory interpretations, ensuring the assessee&#039;s claims were in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>