https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236367 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals for statistical purposes. The first issue regarding the addition of income from despatches to sub-contractors was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination due to a prima facie mistake in treating accounted income as unaccounted. The second issue concerning the incorrect accounting of stock was decided in favor of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition as the stock belonged to another entity and was not owned by the assessee. en-us Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236367 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals for statistical purposes. The first issue regarding the addition of income from despatches to sub-contractors was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination due to a prima facie mistake in treating accounted income as unaccounted. The second issue concerning the incorrect accounting of stock was decided in favor of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition as the stock belonged to another entity and was not owned by the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236367