<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 646 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236354</link>
    <description>Rectification under the record-mistake standard was confined to an obvious and patent error apparent from the record, not to reopening a concluded dispute or introducing a new merits-based contention after prolonged litigation. The Tribunal found that the matter had long proceeded only on recovery mechanism and limitation, while eligibility on merits had never been raised in earlier rounds, and that the amounts had already been reversed. No mistake apparent from the record was established, so rectification was refused and the earlier order remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 646 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236354</link>
      <description>Rectification under the record-mistake standard was confined to an obvious and patent error apparent from the record, not to reopening a concluded dispute or introducing a new merits-based contention after prolonged litigation. The Tribunal found that the matter had long proceeded only on recovery mechanism and limitation, while eligibility on merits had never been raised in earlier rounds, and that the amounts had already been reversed. No mistake apparent from the record was established, so rectification was refused and the earlier order remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>