<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 639 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236347</link>
    <description>Rent-a-cab services supplied to 100% EOU/STPI units for use in connection with exported services were treated as raising a prima facie case against service tax liability, relying on the Board circular dated 25/04/2003 that secondary services used in export activity should not attract tax when the primary services are exported. In the absence of any contrary consideration of the supporting certificates on record, unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the adjudged dues was stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 639 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236347</link>
      <description>Rent-a-cab services supplied to 100% EOU/STPI units for use in connection with exported services were treated as raising a prima facie case against service tax liability, relying on the Board circular dated 25/04/2003 that secondary services used in export activity should not attract tax when the primary services are exported. In the absence of any contrary consideration of the supporting certificates on record, unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the adjudged dues was stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>