<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 633 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236341</link>
    <description>The appeal for A.Y. 2004-05 was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the deduction under section 80IB to the AO for fresh consideration. For A.Y. 2005-06, the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the deduction under section 80IB for fresh consideration. The disallowances under sections 36(1)(va) and 36(1)(iii) were upheld in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 633 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236341</link>
      <description>The appeal for A.Y. 2004-05 was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the deduction under section 80IB to the AO for fresh consideration. For A.Y. 2005-06, the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the deduction under section 80IB for fresh consideration. The disallowances under sections 36(1)(va) and 36(1)(iii) were upheld in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>