<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 626 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236334</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s direction to estimate the profit of the assessee from the liquor business at 5% of the sales turnover for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeals, confirming the CIT (A)&#039;s order. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2002-03 to 2006-07, emphasizing that profit estimation alone does not justify penalty imposition without evidence of a conscious attempt to conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal found the department&#039;s cited decisions inapplicable and confirmed the CIT (A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 626 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236334</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s direction to estimate the profit of the assessee from the liquor business at 5% of the sales turnover for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeals, confirming the CIT (A)&#039;s order. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2002-03 to 2006-07, emphasizing that profit estimation alone does not justify penalty imposition without evidence of a conscious attempt to conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal found the department&#039;s cited decisions inapplicable and confirmed the CIT (A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>