<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 616 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the appellant had fulfilled the export obligation despite not submitting original documents due to the company&#039;s financial situation. The waiver of pre-deposit amounting to Rs.1,35,338 along with interest was granted as the DGFT accepted the documents as genuine, confirming the fulfillment of obligations. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant had met the export obligation within the specified time frame, leading to the disposal of the case in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:28:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 616 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the appellant had fulfilled the export obligation despite not submitting original documents due to the company&#039;s financial situation. The waiver of pre-deposit amounting to Rs.1,35,338 along with interest was granted as the DGFT accepted the documents as genuine, confirming the fulfillment of obligations. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant had met the export obligation within the specified time frame, leading to the disposal of the case in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>