<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 609 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236317</link>
    <description>The Judge found discrepancies in transport records and alleged overloading of vehicles insufficient to deny cenvat credit, noting lack of inquiries with confirming drivers and no implication of the transporter. The Judge waived the pre-deposit requirement and stayed penalty recovery for the main appellant and other noticees, disposing of the stay applications. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the cenvat credit demand but reduced penalties for some noticees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:27:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 609 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236317</link>
      <description>The Judge found discrepancies in transport records and alleged overloading of vehicles insufficient to deny cenvat credit, noting lack of inquiries with confirming drivers and no implication of the transporter. The Judge waived the pre-deposit requirement and stayed penalty recovery for the main appellant and other noticees, disposing of the stay applications. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the cenvat credit demand but reduced penalties for some noticees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>