<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 572 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236280</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15(4) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for irregularly availing credit and restoring the penalty under Rule 15(3). The judgment emphasized the importance of clearly specifying grounds for penalties in show-cause notices to ensure compliance with legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 572 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236280</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15(4) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for irregularly availing credit and restoring the penalty under Rule 15(3). The judgment emphasized the importance of clearly specifying grounds for penalties in show-cause notices to ensure compliance with legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>