<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 559 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236267</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision to withdraw depreciation claimed by the assessee. The court determined that the amendment to Section 32 of the Act, allowing depreciation even if not initially claimed, was prospective and did not apply to the relevant assessment year. As the assessee did not claim depreciation initially, the court ruled in their favor, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 559 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236267</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision to withdraw depreciation claimed by the assessee. The court determined that the amendment to Section 32 of the Act, allowing depreciation even if not initially claimed, was prospective and did not apply to the relevant assessment year. As the assessee did not claim depreciation initially, the court ruled in their favor, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>