<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 552 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236260</link>
    <description>Normal business losses, including brought forward losses, were held to be set off against profits of speculation business because the Income-tax Act creates only an express restriction on setting off speculation losses against non-speculation income. Section 70(1) permits intra-head set-off between sources under the same head, and Section 72(1) allows carry forward of non-speculation business losses against business profits generally. Although Explanation 2 to Section 28 treats speculation business as distinct, that distinction cannot be extended beyond the statute&#039;s express limits, and no additional bar can be read in by implication. The contrary view was treated as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 552 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236260</link>
      <description>Normal business losses, including brought forward losses, were held to be set off against profits of speculation business because the Income-tax Act creates only an express restriction on setting off speculation losses against non-speculation income. Section 70(1) permits intra-head set-off between sources under the same head, and Section 72(1) allows carry forward of non-speculation business losses against business profits generally. Although Explanation 2 to Section 28 treats speculation business as distinct, that distinction cannot be extended beyond the statute&#039;s express limits, and no additional bar can be read in by implication. The contrary view was treated as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>