https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236258 The court dismissed the condonation of delay application and consequently dismissed the appeal due to a significant delay of 351 days in filing the appeal against an appellate order. The court held the appellant responsible for the lack of diligence of their Chartered Accountant, emphasizing the principle of accountability for the actions of one's agent. The judgment underscores the importance of timely and diligent actions in legal proceedings to adhere to procedural timelines and avoid adverse consequences such as appeal dismissal. en-us Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236258 The court dismissed the condonation of delay application and consequently dismissed the appeal due to a significant delay of 351 days in filing the appeal against an appellate order. The court held the appellant responsible for the lack of diligence of their Chartered Accountant, emphasizing the principle of accountability for the actions of one's agent. The judgment underscores the importance of timely and diligent actions in legal proceedings to adhere to procedural timelines and avoid adverse consequences such as appeal dismissal. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236258