<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236250</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the adjudication decision in a case involving the importation of undervalued goods through an unauthorized port, imposing duty and penalties on the appellant. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of lack of knowledge regarding the unauthorized port and undervaluation, the tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the decision, deeming the goods as smuggled under the Customs Act. The tribunal considered the imposed penalties reasonable and confirmed the adjudication decision, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to import procedures to prevent penalties and confiscation of goods for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236250</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the adjudication decision in a case involving the importation of undervalued goods through an unauthorized port, imposing duty and penalties on the appellant. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of lack of knowledge regarding the unauthorized port and undervaluation, the tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the decision, deeming the goods as smuggled under the Customs Act. The tribunal considered the imposed penalties reasonable and confirmed the adjudication decision, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to import procedures to prevent penalties and confiscation of goods for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>