<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 529 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236237</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled on the taxability of amounts collected by the applicants for &quot;Club or Association Services,&quot; including room rentals, interest on instalment sales, income from securitisation, exchange fee, and telephone and fax charges. The Tribunal found that interest on delayed payment of membership fees is subject to service tax, distinguishing it from &quot;interest on loan.&quot; It noted a factual dispute regarding room rentals. The Tribunal directed the applicants to predeposit a specified amount, with the waiver of the balance contingent on this predeposit, emphasizing compliance and reporting within the timeline. Further examination of issues, including limitation, was indicated for the appeal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 529 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236237</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled on the taxability of amounts collected by the applicants for &quot;Club or Association Services,&quot; including room rentals, interest on instalment sales, income from securitisation, exchange fee, and telephone and fax charges. The Tribunal found that interest on delayed payment of membership fees is subject to service tax, distinguishing it from &quot;interest on loan.&quot; It noted a factual dispute regarding room rentals. The Tribunal directed the applicants to predeposit a specified amount, with the waiver of the balance contingent on this predeposit, emphasizing compliance and reporting within the timeline. Further examination of issues, including limitation, was indicated for the appeal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>