<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 494 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236201</link>
    <description>Entitlement to partial waiver of pre-deposit depended on a prima facie assessment of the contract activity and the material on record. The dispute over whether the work was manufacturing-related or supply of manpower required detailed examination at final hearing, so it was not ative at the stay stage. The allegation that service tax had been collected but not paid was unsupported by concrete material and could not by itself justify a larger deposit. As substantial payment had already been made, a further deposit of Rs. 5,00,000 was directed, and on compliance the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 07:48:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 494 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236201</link>
      <description>Entitlement to partial waiver of pre-deposit depended on a prima facie assessment of the contract activity and the material on record. The dispute over whether the work was manufacturing-related or supply of manpower required detailed examination at final hearing, so it was not ative at the stay stage. The allegation that service tax had been collected but not paid was unsupported by concrete material and could not by itself justify a larger deposit. As substantial payment had already been made, a further deposit of Rs. 5,00,000 was directed, and on compliance the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>