https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236195 Section 427 CrPC permits a court to direct concurrent running of later sentences, but the discretion must be exercised on the facts of the transactions. In cheque dishonour complaints, concurrency is generally justified where multiple complaints arise from the same loan or financial arrangement and the cheques are linked to one transaction. Where complaints arise from separate and distinct borrowing transactions, concurrent running is not warranted and the sentences run consecutively. The concurrence direction applies only to substantive sentences and does not extend to default sentences imposed in lieu of fine or compensation. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236195 Section 427 CrPC permits a court to direct concurrent running of later sentences, but the discretion must be exercised on the facts of the transactions. In cheque dishonour complaints, concurrency is generally justified where multiple complaints arise from the same loan or financial arrangement and the cheques are linked to one transaction. Where complaints arise from separate and distinct borrowing transactions, concurrent running is not warranted and the sentences run consecutively. The concurrence direction applies only to substantive sentences and does not extend to default sentences imposed in lieu of fine or compensation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236195