<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 480 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236187</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2004-05, partially addressing issues related to preliminary expenditure, Gratuity payment, and deduction under Section 10B. For the assessment year 2005-06, the appeal was partly allowed, addressing the Gratuity payment issue similarly to the previous year but upholding the disallowance of depreciation on fixed assets. The order was pronounced on June 13, 2013, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 480 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236187</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2004-05, partially addressing issues related to preliminary expenditure, Gratuity payment, and deduction under Section 10B. For the assessment year 2005-06, the appeal was partly allowed, addressing the Gratuity payment issue similarly to the previous year but upholding the disallowance of depreciation on fixed assets. The order was pronounced on June 13, 2013, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>