<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 477 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, affirming the adjustment of the sale consideration based on construction costs. It permitted the appellant to claim exemption under section 54F on all five flats received, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to restrict the claim to a single flat. The Tribunal emphasized that owning multiple residential houses would not disqualify the claim unless another house was acquired within a year before the transfer, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 477 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, affirming the adjustment of the sale consideration based on construction costs. It permitted the appellant to claim exemption under section 54F on all five flats received, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to restrict the claim to a single flat. The Tribunal emphasized that owning multiple residential houses would not disqualify the claim unless another house was acquired within a year before the transfer, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>