https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236175 A trade mark dispute over AMLOBET and AMLOVATE/AMLOVATE-A discusses infringement and passing off in medicinal products, applying comparison of the marks as a whole and a stricter deception test because confusion in medicines may affect public health. The court also considered prior use, finding that earlier and continuous use supported the passing-off claim, and it accepted electronic documentary proof where the statutory certificate was not seriously challenged. Territorial jurisdiction was upheld on evidence of business activity in Delhi, including office operations, an agent, and sales there. The damages claim failed for lack of sufficient proof, although injunctive, accounting and costs relief followed. en-us Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Aug 2013 07:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236175 A trade mark dispute over AMLOBET and AMLOVATE/AMLOVATE-A discusses infringement and passing off in medicinal products, applying comparison of the marks as a whole and a stricter deception test because confusion in medicines may affect public health. The court also considered prior use, finding that earlier and continuous use supported the passing-off claim, and it accepted electronic documentary proof where the statutory certificate was not seriously challenged. Territorial jurisdiction was upheld on evidence of business activity in Delhi, including office operations, an agent, and sales there. The damages claim failed for lack of sufficient proof, although injunctive, accounting and costs relief followed. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236175