https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236160 The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand against the appellant, classifying their activities as services falling under "Business Auxiliary Service." The appellant's arguments for exemption based on trading activities were rejected, with the Tribunal directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 89 lakhs within eight weeks to continue the appeal process. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeal without further Tribunal consideration, while recovery of dues was stayed during the appeal. en-us Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jan 2014 18:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236160 The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand against the appellant, classifying their activities as services falling under "Business Auxiliary Service." The appellant's arguments for exemption based on trading activities were rejected, with the Tribunal directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 89 lakhs within eight weeks to continue the appeal process. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeal without further Tribunal consideration, while recovery of dues was stayed during the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236160