<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 444 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee by accepting the condonation of delay in filing the Cross Objection and admitting it for consideration. Regarding the dispute over the trading addition in assessment, the Tribunal found the addition made by the CIT(A) unjustified as there were no specific leakages or shortcomings in the net profit, ultimately deleting the addition and dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal while allowing the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 444 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee by accepting the condonation of delay in filing the Cross Objection and admitting it for consideration. Regarding the dispute over the trading addition in assessment, the Tribunal found the addition made by the CIT(A) unjustified as there were no specific leakages or shortcomings in the net profit, ultimately deleting the addition and dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal while allowing the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>