<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 411 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act and deleting the addition of Rs. 6,82,757 under Section 40A(3). The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer acted without jurisdiction and on mere suspicion, lacking reasonable grounds or material evidence to support the belief of escaped income. The decision highlighted the importance of factual correctness and reasonable grounds for initiating reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 411 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act and deleting the addition of Rs. 6,82,757 under Section 40A(3). The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer acted without jurisdiction and on mere suspicion, lacking reasonable grounds or material evidence to support the belief of escaped income. The decision highlighted the importance of factual correctness and reasonable grounds for initiating reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>