<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 410 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236115</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It was held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in using Section 154 to rectify the order as the issues were debatable and not apparent mistakes. The rectification power under Section 154 cannot be used to review or revise the original assessment order on debatable matters. The ITAT affirmed that the CIT(A) correctly canceled the order under Section 154, as no mistake was apparent from the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 410 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236115</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It was held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in using Section 154 to rectify the order as the issues were debatable and not apparent mistakes. The rectification power under Section 154 cannot be used to review or revise the original assessment order on debatable matters. The ITAT affirmed that the CIT(A) correctly canceled the order under Section 154, as no mistake was apparent from the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>