<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 382 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236087</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80IB could not be denied merely because the audit report was not filed with the return of income. The Court applied earlier authority holding that the report may be furnished after the return, so long as the statutory requirement is satisfied within the permissible time. As the assessee produced the audit report within that time, refusal of the deduction was unjustified and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 382 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236087</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80IB could not be denied merely because the audit report was not filed with the return of income. The Court applied earlier authority holding that the report may be furnished after the return, so long as the statutory requirement is satisfied within the permissible time. As the assessee produced the audit report within that time, refusal of the deduction was unjustified and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>