<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of proceedings contingent upon remittance of the disallowed cenvat credit amount and interest by a specified date. The Tribunal clarified the interpretation of Rule 2(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, regarding trading activity, and upheld the Commissioner&#039;s method for determining the disallowed cenvat credit. The decision left the issue of invoking the extended period of limitation for consideration during the appeal hearing, setting clear conditions for compliance with remittance requirements to maintain the stay of proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 377 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of proceedings contingent upon remittance of the disallowed cenvat credit amount and interest by a specified date. The Tribunal clarified the interpretation of Rule 2(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, regarding trading activity, and upheld the Commissioner&#039;s method for determining the disallowed cenvat credit. The decision left the issue of invoking the extended period of limitation for consideration during the appeal hearing, setting clear conditions for compliance with remittance requirements to maintain the stay of proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>