<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 356 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236061</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant in a case involving customs duty exemption on imported steel sheets. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s case lacking in reliability and acceptability, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence to prove mis-declaration. The declared price aligned with prime material rates, casting doubt on the quality allegations based on a visual examination report. The appellant&#039;s evidence, including manufacturer&#039;s certificates, supported the claim of prime quality, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 356 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236061</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant in a case involving customs duty exemption on imported steel sheets. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s case lacking in reliability and acceptability, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence to prove mis-declaration. The declared price aligned with prime material rates, casting doubt on the quality allegations based on a visual examination report. The appellant&#039;s evidence, including manufacturer&#039;s certificates, supported the claim of prime quality, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>