<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 355 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236060</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was entitled to interest on the refund amount only from 13.7.2006 to 13.7.2007. The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s right to refund under Section 18(2) of the Customs Act did not automatically include entitlement to interest before 13.7.2006. However, the appellant was granted interest for the period from 13.7.2006 to 13.7.2007 due to delays in refund processing during that timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 355 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236060</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was entitled to interest on the refund amount only from 13.7.2006 to 13.7.2007. The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s right to refund under Section 18(2) of the Customs Act did not automatically include entitlement to interest before 13.7.2006. However, the appellant was granted interest for the period from 13.7.2006 to 13.7.2007 due to delays in refund processing during that timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>