<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 340 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236045</link>
    <description>Adjustment of excess input tax credit against a later return period was required to be reconsidered where refund applications had been filed and the revenue had itself adjusted excess payments in other cases. On those facts, the Court found no basis for insisting on immediate liability with interest and penalty without further examination. However, it expressly left open the scope and effect of Section 11(6) and did not decide the substantive statutory controversy on merits. The assessing authority was directed to reconsider the objections raised in response to the notice and pass fresh orders in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 340 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236045</link>
      <description>Adjustment of excess input tax credit against a later return period was required to be reconsidered where refund applications had been filed and the revenue had itself adjusted excess payments in other cases. On those facts, the Court found no basis for insisting on immediate liability with interest and penalty without further examination. However, it expressly left open the scope and effect of Section 11(6) and did not decide the substantive statutory controversy on merits. The assessing authority was directed to reconsider the objections raised in response to the notice and pass fresh orders in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>