<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 337 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236042</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving the dispensation of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty, granting the appellants an opportunity to present evidence. Regarding the applicability of service tax on grant-in-aid, discrepancies in the Commissioner&#039;s order led to a remand for re-evaluation. The Commissioner&#039;s failure to consider evidence and correspondence resulted in the order being set aside for fresh consideration. The Tribunal granted an unconditional stay petition due to the Commissioner&#039;s failure to adequately differentiate the present case from earlier decisions, emphasizing the importance of addressing all issues and following remand orders diligently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:02:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 337 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236042</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving the dispensation of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty, granting the appellants an opportunity to present evidence. Regarding the applicability of service tax on grant-in-aid, discrepancies in the Commissioner&#039;s order led to a remand for re-evaluation. The Commissioner&#039;s failure to consider evidence and correspondence resulted in the order being set aside for fresh consideration. The Tribunal granted an unconditional stay petition due to the Commissioner&#039;s failure to adequately differentiate the present case from earlier decisions, emphasizing the importance of addressing all issues and following remand orders diligently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>