<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 335 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236040</link>
    <description>The appellant, a general insurance service provider, faced challenges in adjusting service tax refunds against subsequent liabilities due to discrepancies in refunds directly paid to insured individuals and lack of documentary proof. The Revenue questioned the treatment of refunds through intermediaries, emphasizing the need for proper verification and compliance with guidelines to prevent potential revenue loss. The Tribunal upheld a previous order, remitting the matter for re-evaluation, stressing the importance of evidence regarding revenue loss and granting the appellant an opportunity to present a defense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 335 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236040</link>
      <description>The appellant, a general insurance service provider, faced challenges in adjusting service tax refunds against subsequent liabilities due to discrepancies in refunds directly paid to insured individuals and lack of documentary proof. The Revenue questioned the treatment of refunds through intermediaries, emphasizing the need for proper verification and compliance with guidelines to prevent potential revenue loss. The Tribunal upheld a previous order, remitting the matter for re-evaluation, stressing the importance of evidence regarding revenue loss and granting the appellant an opportunity to present a defense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>