<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 319 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236024</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation applications for a 534-day delay in filing appeals under the Customs Act, 1962. Despite citing health issues and medical treatment abroad, the applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons and evidence to justify the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed explanations in condonation cases, leading to the rejection of the application and subsequent dismissal of the appeals and stay applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:58:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 319 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236024</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation applications for a 534-day delay in filing appeals under the Customs Act, 1962. Despite citing health issues and medical treatment abroad, the applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons and evidence to justify the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed explanations in condonation cases, leading to the rejection of the application and subsequent dismissal of the appeals and stay applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>