<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 315 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236020</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition as the respondent&#039;s defense, based on the lack of proper notice before the transfer of pledged shares and questions regarding the petitioner&#039;s right to transfer the shares, raised substantial issues warranting further examination. The court found the defense to be bona fide and deserving of deeper consideration, leading to the dismissal of the petition with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 315 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236020</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition as the respondent&#039;s defense, based on the lack of proper notice before the transfer of pledged shares and questions regarding the petitioner&#039;s right to transfer the shares, raised substantial issues warranting further examination. The court found the defense to be bona fide and deserving of deeper consideration, leading to the dismissal of the petition with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>