<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 312 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236017</link>
    <description>A strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit may arise where the demand appears time-barred on the admitted chronology. Here, credit was availed in 2004 and the show cause notice was issued in 2010, so the demand appeared to be raised beyond the normal limitation period. On that basis, the appellant was found to have a strong interim case on limitation, and waiver of pre-deposit was granted together with stay of recovery of the disputed amounts pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:53:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 312 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236017</link>
      <description>A strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit may arise where the demand appears time-barred on the admitted chronology. Here, credit was availed in 2004 and the show cause notice was issued in 2010, so the demand appeared to be raised beyond the normal limitation period. On that basis, the appellant was found to have a strong interim case on limitation, and waiver of pre-deposit was granted together with stay of recovery of the disputed amounts pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>