<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 296 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236001</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that the respondent&#039;s activities did not constitute clearing and forwarding services under Section 65(a) of the Finance Act, 1994, and thus were not liable for service tax under that category. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurately classifying services based on their essential characteristics and the burden of proof on the Revenue to substantiate their claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 296 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236001</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that the respondent&#039;s activities did not constitute clearing and forwarding services under Section 65(a) of the Finance Act, 1994, and thus were not liable for service tax under that category. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurately classifying services based on their essential characteristics and the burden of proof on the Revenue to substantiate their claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>