<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 295 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the applicant was liable for service tax on construction activities for buyers of Undivided Shares (UDS), rejecting arguments based on developer status and time-barred demand. A pre-deposit of Rs. 4,50,00,000/- was ordered within eight weeks, with waived balance dues&#039; pre-deposit and stay on collection during the appeal. The decision emphasizes the significance of the service provider-recipient relationship in determining service tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 295 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the applicant was liable for service tax on construction activities for buyers of Undivided Shares (UDS), rejecting arguments based on developer status and time-barred demand. A pre-deposit of Rs. 4,50,00,000/- was ordered within eight weeks, with waived balance dues&#039; pre-deposit and stay on collection during the appeal. The decision emphasizes the significance of the service provider-recipient relationship in determining service tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>