<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 287 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235992</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment, ruling that the Assessing Officer did not independently believe that income had escaped assessment but acted under the influence of the audit party. The petition was disposed of, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:23:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 287 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235992</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment, ruling that the Assessing Officer did not independently believe that income had escaped assessment but acted under the influence of the audit party. The petition was disposed of, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>